Michael R. Houston

Partner

Michael R. Houston

Partner

Dr. Michael (Mike) Houston is a partner and intellectual property lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP. He leads the firm’s Patent Office Trials Practice, and is a member of Foley’s IP Litigation Group, its Chemical, Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Practice, and the Health Care and Life Sciences and Energy Sectors (with a focus on renewable energy and bitcoin mining operations).

Mike prosecutes and defends virtually every type of intellectual property dispute, including patent infringement and trade secret cases, patent challenges before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), trademark litigation, and investigations before the International Trade Commission (ITC), including disputes having international scope. His practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) includes not only inter partes reviews (IPRs), but also rare post-grant reviews (PGRs) and derivation (DER) proceedings, with a success rate so exceptional that he has been recognized by Patexia® as a Top-5 Best Performing Attorney for IPRs.

A Ph.D. chemical engineer by training followed by several years of R&D experience at a startup company, Mike is a named inventor on over 40 patents and patent applications and understands true innovation. He has a deep understanding of a vast array of technical areas, including electronics and microelectronics, packaging, chemistry, biotechnology, nanotechnology, optics and ophthalmic lenses, polymerization and polymer processing, and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). He has handled patent disputes involving small-molecule and protein-based pharmaceuticals (including Orange Book-listed drugs/ANDA litigation), medical devices and treatments, solar panels, electronics, semiconductor manufacture and packaging, complex mechanical devices (including medical implants and large industrial processing equipment), and biorenewable fuels, to name a few.

Mike’s broad-based IP experience also includes: counseling related to optimizing IP protection through multiple avenues, particularly in the areas of computer software and algorithms; handling contractual disputes concerning IP rights and the theft or use of IP by a company’s former employees, business partners and/or independent contractors; counseling clients on IP protections and concerns in working with business collaborators/partnerships; handling cases involving the intersection of trade secrets, patent infringement, and FDA clearances; and conducting discovery abroad throughout Europe, Singapore, and Japan.

Mike also believes in giving back to the community, dedicating a portion of his practice to pro bono efforts, resulting, for example, in recoveries for the unconstitutional treatment of prisoners and the reversal of improper foreclosures.

Representative Experience

Exemplary patents as co-author and named inventor:

  • Method of Drying Passivated Micromachines by Dewetting from a Liquid-Based Process, US 6,114,044
  • Expandable Polymeric Fibers and Their Method of Production, US 6,221,486
  • Near-Net-Shape Polymerization Process and Materials Suitable for Use Therewith, US 6,380,314
  • Hollow Polymeric Fibers, US 6,387,492
  • Precision Composite Lens, US 6,416,690
  • Morphology Trapping and Materials Suitable for Use Therewith, US 6,419,858
  • Precision Composite Article, US 6,570,714
  • Method for Synthesizing Thermo-Expandable Polymeric Microspheres, US 6,617,364
  • Microcellular Foams, Their Method of Production, and Uses and Products Thereof, US 6,638,984

Awards and Recognition

  • Named among Top 5 most successful IPR practitioners by Patexia® (2018)
20 February 2024 Events

2023 PTAB Year in Review

The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board had another newsworthy year in 2023. Please join Foley & Lardner for a webinar looking back at the past year's major developments and how they may impact practice before the PTAB in 2024.
27 July 2022 Blogs

Past and Future: How Prior IPR Representations Can Haunt Your Future Patent Infringement Complaint

Judge Albright of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas granted, in part, Meta Platforms, Inc.’s (“Meta”) 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss (“Motion”) in Grecia Estate Holdings LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (6:21-CV-00677).
16 March 2022 Blogs

PTAB Precedential Decision Clarifies When a Wire Transfer “Payment Is Received” by the Board

The PTAB Precedential Opinion Panel recently issued a precedential decision clarifying when a wire transfer “payment is received” via the Federal Reserve Fedwire System.
24 February 2022 Events

2021 PTAB Year in Review

Please join seasoned Foley & Lardner PTAB Trials Practice Group attorneys Mike Houston and George Beck on February 24, 2022, for a discussion of the year's major developments and how they may impact practice before the PTAB going forward.
03 June 2020 Events

Webinar: Strategies and Considerations for IPR Petitioners Working with Other Interested Parties

Recent decisions by both the U.S. Patent Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Federal Courts are significantly affecting the landscape for Inter Partes Review and other post-grant proceeding petitions.
21 May 2020

Webinar: Top Considerations for IPR Petitioners with Customer-Supplier/Service Provider Relationships

Recent decisions by both the U.S. Patent Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Federal Courts are significantly affecting the landscape for Inter Partes Review and other post-grant proceeding petitions.